Back to the lesson
Group discussionCBC / CBE

Standardizing Evidence Selection Criteria

Group Discussion

Worth 10 marks. Post your contribution; fellow learners review it — if no peer review arrives within 2 hours, an AI assessor grades it instead.

Discussion question · 10 marks

Select one specific core competency from your subject area and describe how you would design a student-led checklist that enables learners to self-select evidence for their portfolio. How would you ensure this evidence is authentic, and what specific steps would you take to moderate this evidence with your colleagues to ensure it meets the required standard? Provide a concrete example of how this process would support a student who is struggling to meet the assessment criteria.

What a full-mark response shows

  • Critically evaluates how KICD criteria are applied to evidence selection with specific examples.
  • Demonstrates an understanding of the relationship between learner-led selection and competency acquisition.
  • Proposes a clear, actionable plan for departmental moderation that minimizes bias.
  • Connects evidence selection theory to the development of inclusive, differentiated classroom practice.
Log in to join the discussion

0 contributions